Carbon Value between Equivalence and Differentiation

Author: Steffen Dalsgaard
Volume 5, Number 1 (2014)

The Kyoto International Conference Center, designed by Sachio Otani and where the Kyoto Protocol was signed in December 1997 (© Chris Guy, via Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0).

Abstract:

The adoption of the Kyoto Protocol was a major breakthrough in committing industrialized countries to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases, even if the effect is disputed. The protocol works through mechanisms that ascribe value to the environment in terms of those emissions—a numerical value based on carbon, which is then translated into a monetary value. This article reviews the different understandings of value implicated in debates about the environment seen through carbon. It does this by contrasting the values embedded in some of the various initiatives that have resulted from the Kyoto Protocol, and how they relate to the market, government control, and individual consumer morality, among other things. Controversy over carbon trading is entangled in the capacity of carbon to commensurate a wide range of human and nonhuman actions via their cost in emissions, which nevertheless is countered by moral differentiation.



STEFFEN DALSGAARD
is Head of  the research group Technologies in Practice and of the Department of Business IT at the IT University of Copenhagen. He holds a PhD in anthropology and ethnography from Aarhus University. Since 2002 he has conducted research in the province of Manus, Papua New Guinea, specializing in state and political leadership with a particular focus on tradition, exchange, and elections. He is currently working on two projects: democratic technologies in Denmark and the introduction of carbon as a form of value. Among his recent publications is “Time and the Field,” a special issue of Social Analysis edited with Morten Nielsen (2013).